Showing posts with label broken promises. Show all posts
Showing posts with label broken promises. Show all posts

Thursday, July 08, 2010

Health-care rationing has arrived

Health-care rationing is a key component of Obamacare and the president has found his man to oversee the government's efforts to decide who gets future health care and who doesn't. In other words, who lives and who dies.

From CNSNews.com:
President Barack Obama today circumvented the Senate confirmation process by granting a recess appointment to Dr. Donald Berwick to be director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the federal agency that runs Medicare and Medicaid.

Berwick, a professor at Harvard Medical School and CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (a think tank), has expressed his disdain for free-market medicine and his "love" for Great Britain's government-run health-care system, while advocating health-care rationing and using the health-care system to redistribute wealth.

The directorship of CMS normally requires confirmation by the Senate, which currently has a 59-member majority of President Obama's party (counting Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut Independent who caucuses with Senate Democrats).

Obama initially sent Dr. Berwick's nomination to the Senate in April, where it was assigned to the Senate Finance Committee chaired by Sen. Max Baucus, the Montana Democrat, who had worked closely with the Obama White House in developing the national health-care law that President Obama signed in March. Baucus had not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Dr. Berwick.
Read the full story, "Obama's Unconfirmed 'Recess' Appointee to Run Medicare Advocated Rationing, Redistribution of Wealth," here.

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Unemployment up in 43 states

The Obama Recession continues -- 12 consecutive months of economic futility by the best and brightest the Democratic Party has to offer.

From The Associated Press:
Unemployment rates rose in 43 states last month, the government said Friday, painting a bleak picture of the job market that illustrated nationwide data released two weeks ago.
The rise in joblessness was a sharp change from November, when 36 states said their unemployment rates fell. Four states — South Carolina, Delaware, Florida and North Carolina — reported record-high jobless rates in December.
New Jersey's rate, meanwhile, rose to a 33-year high of 10.1 percent while New York's reached a 26-year high of 9 percent.
Analysts said the report showed the economy is recovering at too weak a pace to generate consistent job creation.
Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Poll: More Than Half of Americans Say Health Reform Is Not Worth Increasing the Deficit

From CNSNews.com:
Support for President Obama's health care reform sank lower in December than it dipped in August, after a summer of opposition at town halls and tea party gatherings across the country.

A Quinnipiac University poll released last week, which measured the views of likely voters on a range of current events, found that fewer Americans approve of how the president is handling the issue; fewer believe health care reform is important enough to increase the deficit; and fewer believe President Obama will be able to make the bill deficit-neutral, than when the same questions were asked on Aug. 5.

Quinnipiac asked voters: "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling health care?"

Obama saw 46 percent approval from voters in the beginning of July, but as members of the House of Representatives went home for August recess, approval dipped to just 39 percent on Aug. 5. After a slight rebound in the fall, Obama’s approval rating on the issue crept further down to 38 percent.

Over the same period, those who disapproved of the president's handling of health care grew in ranks from 42 percent in July to 52 percent in August to 56 percent in the December poll. Meanwhile, the number of respondents who remained unsure shrank by more than half from 13 percent to just 6 percent.
Read the full article at CNSNews.com

Monday, November 02, 2009

Obama job approval continues to slide



Barack Obama came into office with a 62% job approval number, but that has dropped to 48% by October. Rasmussen offers a month-by-month look at Obama's failed presidency.

From Rasmussen Reports:
The president's ratings dipped slightly in October after stabilizing in September.

In October, for the third straight month, 39% Strongly Disapproved of the president's performance. The number who Strongly Approved fell two percentage points to 29%, the president's lowest full-month total to date. That leads to a Presidential Approval Index rating of -10, also a new low for Obama.

Also in October, the president's total approval slipped a point to 48%. His total disapproval remained stable at 51%.
Obama Approval Index Month-by-Month

Posted using ShareThis

Originaly posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

More negative marks for Obama in latest Harris Poll

If this was a report card, Barack Obama would be flunking out of school.

The latest Harris Poll shows a majority of Americans give President Obama negative ratings on his handling of a dozen major issues.

Among the lowest numbers are for Obama's handling of unemployment, the federal deficit and the war in Afghanistan.

From the Harris Poll:
As President Obama's overall approval rating continues to slide, he cannot find much solace in Americans' opinions on his handling of 12 different issues as he does not have a positive rating on any of these.

The top one for President Obama is reducing the threat of terrorist attack with 41% giving his job on this a positive rating, down from 49% who said so in August. Two in five Americans also give the President positive marks on the environment (40%, down from 43% in August) and education (40% up from 37% in August).

These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,293 adults surveyed online between October 5 and 12, 2009 by Harris Interactive.

President Obama is dealing with two different wars - one in Iraq and one in Afghanistan - and the American public is not pleased with his handling of either of them. In August two in five U.S. adults (42%) gave the president positive marks on his handling of the war in Iraq. Currently, that number has dropped to 34% while 66% give President Obama negative ratings on this war. The numbers for Afghanistan have gone down even more. In August, two in five (41%) gave the president positive ratings on the war in Afghanistan but now just one-quarter of Americans (27%) give him positive marks while 73% give him negative ratings.

The president has also spent a great deal of time trying to win the American public's support for his health reform plan but does not seem to be making much headway on this issue. Just three in ten Americans (31%) give President Obama positive ratings on his handling of health care while 69% give him negative ratings. In August, over one-third (35%) of U.S. adults gave the president positive ratings on this issue.

Looking at economic issues at least two-thirds of Americans give him negative ratings on all of these issues. On the economy overall, 67% give the president negative marks while one-third (33%) give him positive ones. In September, 40% gave President Obama positive marks on his handling of the economy. More specifically on his handling of regulating the financial system three in ten Americans (31%) give the president positive ratings while 69% give him negative marks. In August, 37% of Americans gave the president's job on this positive marks.

When it comes to the issue of taxes, three in ten Americans (29%) give the president positive marks on his handling of this issue while 71% give him negative ratings. Just one-quarter of Americans (26%) gives the president's handling of employment/unemployment a positive rating, down from 31% who felt this way in August. And, his lowest number is on the federal budget deficit where almost four in five Americans (78%) give President Obama negative marks and only 22% give him positive ratings.

So what?

The President needs a win, whether it is health care reform, some good economic numbers that matter to the American people or a change in Afghanistan. But, until he has something that resonates with the American public in a positive light, there is a sense that a negative attitude will permeate over all issues. One thing to note, education has actually ticked up a little and the White House had put forth their new education initiatives recently. Maybe this is the one issue that they should focus on for the near term, as long as they don't take their eye off of the economy.
For more numbers from the Harris Poll, visit www.harrisinteractive.com

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Monday, July 06, 2009

Newspaper: 'A stimulus for the rich'

The Washington Times is the latest newspaper to criticize Barack Obama's failed "stimulus" package, calling it "a stimulus for the rich" in a new editorial.

From the editorial:
President Obama billed the stimulus package as a national effort, one that would involve spending "in communities across America." But the money is not being doled out proportionally across the country. The most funds are not even being distributed to the areas with the greatest economic problems.

It is not surprising that political calculations play a major role when the government hands out money. But it is shocking that Mr. Obama and the Democrats are sending stimulus funds to those places that need help the least.
Read the full editorial at the newspaper's Web site.

Friday, May 08, 2009

Where's the media outrage?

From NewsBusters:
Obama to Cut Slain Officer's Benefits in Half -- Where's Media Outrage?

By Warner Todd Huston | May 8, 2009

In a hypocrisy sure to outrage, just as Attorney General Eric Holder gets ready to attend a ceremony to honor fallen police officers, the Obama administration is proposing to cut almost in half a program that provides benefits to the families left behind.

So much for the more loving, more caring president "we've been waiting for." So, wouldn't you think the Old Media would be braying at the hypocrisy here? Wouldn't you rather think that the Old Media would be up in arms about this one? Isn't this typically the type of story that would get them motivated to get their high dudgeon on? Guess not because it is nearly invisible in the media today.

Friday, April 03, 2009

Obama, Dems target small business with higher taxes

Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats have targeted America's small business owners with massive new tax hikes.

From Associated Builders and Contractors:
Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) today voiced its opposition to the proposed tax increases in the fiscal 2010 concurrent budget resolutions under debate in both the U.S. Senate (S. Con. Res.13) and in the U.S. House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 85).

"The vast majority of ABC's 25,000 members are small businesses — businesses that will take the hardest hits from increases to the top individual tax rates and limits on amounts those small business owners can take in itemized deductions," said 2009 ABC National Chairman Jerry Gorski, president of Gorski Engineering Inc., Collegeville, Pa. "Tough economic times are forcing many of our members to face difficult decisions to cut costs and jobs in order to stay in business. Unquestionably the last thing these small business owners and the workers they employ need is significant tax increases."

According to an analysis by the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee, "S. Con. Res. 13 raises taxes by $361 billion and allows for $1.3 trillion in additional tax increases." In addition, the analysis found that "the resolution raises taxes on small businesses and others in the top two tax brackets, raises capital gains and dividend taxes, and allows the death tax to return."

"ABC also has serious concerns with the emissions tax, or 'cap-and-trade' proposal, contained within this budget," added Gorski. "This tax increase could have both direct and downstream impacts on ABC member companies by increasing the costs of fuel and building materials. However, it is unclear at this point how such a program would be constructed."

Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) is a national association representing 25,000 merit shop construction and construction-related firms in 79 chapters across the United States. Visit us at www.abc.org

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Obama signs spending bill in private

Barack Obama announced today he will sign the $410 billion stop-gap budget bill approved by the Democratic Congress even though the bill contains billions in pork-barrel projects.

The ceremony took place behind closed doors, something anathema to the Obama administration, which loves to stage media events for every White House ceremony. Why the secrecy?

Obama acknowledge the earmarks, saying it was an "imperfect" bill, but he was forced to sign it to keep the government going.

He also confessed that he was breaking his own campaign promise to eliminate earmarks. Apparently, he had his fingers crossed when he made that promise.

Obama said "99 percent" of the bill is legitimate spending, so that's good enough for him as he lowers the standard for reform and ethical government even further.

In his defense, Obama said earmarks have been part of the Washington culture for decades, including the years Republicans controlled Congress. In other words, two wrongs do make a right, according to Obama.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele had this to say about the Democratic spending package, loaded with more than 8,500 pork projects:
"President Obama will break his pledge to go through every line of the budget if he signs this omnibus spending bill. Like the stimulus bill and budget, this spending bill contains too much taxing, spending, and borrowing. Left unchecked, the Democrats' spending spree will grow our national debt and ultimately result in more taxes. Hard-working Americans deserve better from its leaders than the Democrats' tax-and-spend agenda."
Obama did promise not to sign the next pork-laden budget bill Congress sends his way ... unless he changes his mind again. Welcome to the liberal world ... where principles don't matter, where 99 percent is good enough.

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

'What is Obama ashamed of?'

The Libertarian Party is blasting Barack Obama for breaking more promises by holding a secret signing ceremony of the $400+ billion pork-spending bill approved by Congressional Democrats.

From a press released issued today by the Libertarian National Committee:
America's third largest party asked Wednesday why President Obama enacted the $490 billion FY09 omnibus spending and its over 8,500 earmarks behind closed doors, and despite campaign promises to end earmark abuse.

"President Obama's decision to hide from the media while signing this bill isn't just a violation of his promise of transparency, it's an attempt to avoid questions about breaking another promise to end earmark abuse," said Libertarian National Committee Communications Director Donny Ferguson.

"He promised to end earmarks. He promised transparency. He promised fiscal responsibility. He didn't mean a word of it. More and more Americans realize his crippling taxes and crushing debt are prescriptions for prolonged economic suffering. Now he has to hide behind closed doors to sign his pork-stuffed plan to explode wasteful spending," said Ferguson.

Libertarians support an economic renewal plan centered on tax and regulatory relief for employers, preserving the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts that blunted previous recessions and greatly simplifying the tax code for employers and taxpayers. Polls such as Rasmussen show voters prefer the Libertarian approach over the Republican and Democrat plans to increase government spending.
You can find more information on the Libertarian Party by visiting www.LP.org

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Will Obama break another promise?

America's third largest political party wants President Obama to live up to his pledge to "end politics as usual in Washington" and veto a $410 billion spending bill that includes more than 8,500 pork projects.

The Libertarian Party says the earmarks in the bill total $7.7 billion and fly in the face of Obama's campaign promises.

From a release issued by the Libertarian Party:
"Republicans already broke their weeks-old promise to stand for fiscal responsibility by fighting to have their own wasteful earmarks included in the bill," said Libertarian National Committee Communications Director Donny Ferguson. "Will Obama keep his promise to end earmarks by vetoing this bill, or will this be the latest in a long strong of broken Obama promises?"

The White House has indicated Obama will sign the bill, despite his earlier promises to oppose earmarking.

"Republicans are banding together to grab taxpayer cash and Obama is ignoring his own pledge to stop the practice. With Republicans and Democrats working together to continue wasteful spending it's abundantly clear the Libertarian Party is the only party agreeing with the American people that earmarks must be abolished," said Ferguson.
Good luck with that. I'm afraid Libertarians were had by Obama just like a lot of Democrats and Republicans. And why the Libertarian Party so harsh on Congressional Republicans? Most of the pork spending was included by the Democrats.

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Monday, January 19, 2009

Rendell scheme to cut taxes with gambling is a bust

Daniel R. Reynolds, writing in The Philadelphia Inquirer, says that after five years in operation, Pennsylvania's much-ballyhooed gambling venture has turned out to be a bust.

"Expanding gaming in Pennsylvania is simply an additional de facto tax - on top of the state lottery implemented many years ago," Reynolds writes.

Gov. Ed Rendell's promises of substantial property tax relief have never materialized, Reynolds says.

From Reynold's column:
There is work to be done on the issue of taxation in Pennsylvania, but it is not the work that Rendell, Fumo, and their brethren in Harrisburg have done - and that, in the end, can benefit only casino operators. Lawmakers must lead for the good of the entire public, not just a segment of it, and abolish the property tax as a means of funding public education in Pennsylvania.

The residential property tax is a regressive tax - that is, it taxes poor people at higher rates than it does rich people. Because of their lower property values, poor communities are forced to implement higher property taxes to raise enough money to fund their schools. And communities with high property values can afford to keep their property taxes lower.
Read the full column at the newspaper's Web site.

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Newspaper: PA must change the way it funds schools

Republican lawmakers are pushing for the elimination of property taxes in Pennsylvania. Democrats want a new way to fund public education.

That is the $10 billion dilemma that has been facing Harrisburg for decades.

The two sides should be working together, says The Mercury in its editorial, "Tax-reform plan and school funding formula should go hand-in-hand"

From the editorial:
It's time for a bi-partisan solution. The local tax burden and shortfalls in school funding go hand in hand. But every time resolution draws near, legislators on both sides back down for fear of losing local control of schools if the state holds the purse strings.

This is not about losing control, it’s about fixing a broken system. The two issues of tax reform and school funding go hand in hand. Why not reach across the aisle and join them?
Read the full editorial here.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Blame Democrats for rising gas prices

The price of regular unleaded is $3.59 today. Gas prices have skyrocketed since Democrats took control of Congress in January 2007.

Why isn't anyone blaming the Democrats? When Democrats made all those promises in the fall of 2006 about ending the war in Iraq and helping the middle class, the price of gas was $2.62 a gallon.

And if Sen. Barack Obama has a plan to deal with rising gas prices, why isn't he revealing it to us now? Do we have to wait nine more months (until he is sworn in as president) to bring down gas prices?

Read more about the Democrats' inaction over rising gas prices at Save The GOP blog.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

How low can Pennsylvania go?

POLICY BLOG reports that The Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council has ranked Pennsylvania 28th in its Business Tax Index 2008 survey.

It's the latest poor showing for Gov. Ed Rendell's Pennsylvania in national rankings of the state's business climate.

POLICY BLOG recaps the state's mediocrity:
* Pacific Research Institute State Tort Liability Rankings - 45th
* Beacon Hill Institute State Competitiveness Report 2007 - 34th
* ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index - 44th on Economic Performance; 37th for Economic Outlook
* Alliance for Worker Freedom Index of Worker Freedom - F (Tied for worst)
Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council Policy Environment for Entrepreneurship. - 24th
* Tax Foundation State Business Tax Climate Index - 27th
* Tax Foundation State and Local Tax Burden - 24th (50 is best)
* CEO Magazine Best States to do Business - 37th (
* Forbes Magazine Best States For Business - 39th

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Democracy Rising Marks 1,000 Days Since The Pay Raise

From Tim Potts at DemocracyRisingPa:

Reality Check
1,000 - Days since the Pay Raise of 2005.
2 - Laws enacted to improve government integrity. See the cartoon.
0 - "Best-in-America" laws enacted. See the campaign.
See the full April edition of "Reality Check" on the web.

1,000 Days
It's been 1,000 days since the Pay Raise of 2005, and this could be the last time we mention it. But we have to observe how little state government has done to remove corruption and raise standards of public integrity.

This is especially poignant for those who remember the 1,000 days of President John F. Kennedy's Administration. At a time when the Soviet Union, America's Cold War adversary, had dramatically demonstrated superiority in missile technology, Kennedy announced our determination to "put a man on the moon and return him safely to earth" by the end of the 1960's. He created the Peace Corps and the Food for Peace program to prove that America could use peaceful means to compete with the Soviet Union for the hearts and minds of people in developing nations.

Kennedy also had his failings. The attempt to overthrow Cuba's Fidel Castro at the Bay of Pigs hurt America's image and strengthened Castro. He expanded America's disastrous involvement in Vietnam. While Kennedy sympathized with African-Americans' quest for equal rights, he did not lead the fight before his assassination as Lyndon Johnson did when he became President.

Back to PA. It's safe to say that voters have done more than their public officials to improve state government in the past 1,000 days. Beginning with the defeat of former Supreme Court Justice Russell Nigro that forced the repeal of the pay raise in 2005, voters turned out in higher numbers than expected to replace four legislative leaders and dozens of rank-and-file lawmakers a year later. In January 2007, 56 new lawmakers took office, replacing 24 who were defeated; 31 who retired rather than face the voters; and 1 who left for another job.

Before the 2008 elections, another 25 lawmakers are retiring, and two (potentially three) have been removed from the ballot because of flawed nominating petitions. So between November of 2006 and January of 2009, voters will replace at least 83 incumbents. That's one-third of the General Assembly, creating new opportunities for improving state government.

What has state government done? It ended our reign as the only state, for five years, that had no law to control lobbying. But our new law is weak and does not do what two-thirds of Pennsylvanians want: prohibit lobbyists from providing gifts, meals, travel and other inducements to public officials.

We have a new open records law for the first time in 50 years, but it too is weak. It allows the legislature and judiciary to police themselves, inviting corruption, and penalties for public officials who violate the law are just about meaningless.

Nothing that the legislature has done in 1,000 days gives PA bragging rights for the best that American representative democracy has to offer. Among many other things, there have been no improvements in:

* Changing our second-worst system for drawing legislative districts (see below)
Prohibiting lame-duck session, favored by 82 percent of PA voters
* Making elections accurate, reliable and verifiable as well as leveling the playing field for all candidates
* Auditing the legislature according to generally accepted auditing principles
Revising one of the weakest campaign funding laws in America
* Authorizing a Constitution convention to debate and decide reforms that lawmakers cannot force themselves to adopt

Nor has anything changed to prevent another Pay Raise of 2005. The General Assembly still can suspend the rules to adopt gut-and-replace laws, and they have refused to act on proposals for an independent body to study and recommend compensation for public officials. They are just biding their time.

Something Everyone Can Do

The competition of candidates and ideas is the heart of democracy, but PA's system for drawing legislative districts intentionally stifles competition. This year, the number of legislative districts with no competition in the primary is three to five times the number that do have competition. Unless third party candidates claw their way onto the ballot, half of the House seats and three-fourths of the Senate seats will have no competition in November.

It's just 84 days until June 23, the deadline for the House and Senate to improve how PA draws legislative districts. Make your voice heard now in newspapers, groceries, bars, beauty salons, civic groups, on radio - everywhere that creates a buzz lawmakers will hear.

Another decade of the worst - or the best - system is at stake.