Sunday, April 12, 2009

The Specter Myth

Ryan Shafik of the Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research does an excellent job of exposing the electability myths around Sen. Arlen Specter in a recent op-ed piece.

Shafik details why Specter is not the only Republican who can win a General Election for one of two Pennsylvania U.S. Senate seats. Shafik also argues that Specter is rapidly losing support of Democrats and independents.

From Shafik's column:
Specter's general election numbers are at an all time low. In fact, he is 15 points lower than Sen. Rick Santorum was at this point leading up to his 2006 drubbing. Consider these facts: in late February 2005, Santorum had a "deserves re-election" number of 53 percent, according to the Quinnipiac Poll taken that time and a 30 percent "does not deserve re-elect." Despite his relatively positive re-elect numbers, Santorum was losing a prospective matchup to then Pennsylvania Treasurer Bob Casey, according to that same poll.

Specter's numbers are much more dismal. Specter, in March 2009, had a "deserves re-elect" of 38 percent and 41percent "does not deserve" re-elect. Fifteen points lower that Santorum and dangerously low numbers for a 30-year incumbent. If we scratch the surface even further, we will see why these numbers spell doom for Specter and furthermore, why they won't likely improve his chances for renomination next May or re-election in November 2010.
Read the full column at The Pottstown Mercury Web site.

Originally posted at TONY PHYRILLAS